The Database




The database for this article derives from common pleas attorney warrant rolls that are available on the AALT site (attorney warrant rolls constitute the final membranes in any given plea roll.) I took thorough notes on the Hilary, Easter, and Trinity term warrant rolls for 1348, so that the count of lawyers functioning as attorneys in the court of common pleas and their relative activity covers the January to June 1348 time period. I added to that number information taken from the Michaelmas 1348 roll (without changing the assessment of relative activity), but allocated new attorney names from the South and West to new attorneys after the Black Death and all others to pre-Black Death attorneys.

The appropriate time period for comparison with the time after the Black Death was a problem. The amount of litigation was far less, and the attorney warrant rolls were thus much shorter: the likelihood of an active attorney appearing in any given term was far lower than prior to the Black Death. I settled for identifying the lawyers who appeared in the year and a half beginning in Trinity 1350 and ending in Michaelmas 1351. In this post-Black Death part of the database, I did not note frequency of appearance.

In both pre- and post-Black Death rolls, I tried to assess the county/counties of most frequent activity. That assessment derived primarily from marginations. Since overt property actions were relatively frequent at the time, marginations are better guides for attorney activity than in the fifteenth century and after, but they are still somewhat problematic: personal actions were already more frequent than property actions, and the marginations could thus mislead. In this analysis, the only problem possible from misleading marginations would be in the allocation of attorneys to pre- or post-Black Death categories from the Michaelmas 1348 roll, but the numbers of new attorneys appearing in Michaelmas 1348 was small relative to the whole group and only a few of those would be mis-allocated.

The database seems very reliable. I am tempted to check the pre-Black Death attorney group by going through the Michaelmas 1347 roll. If I do, I will revise this article to include that analysis, but the chance that that roll would produce any significant increase in the number of pre-Black Death attorneys who continued to function after the Black Death seems slight.



AALT Homepage