Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, & John Giste v. Leonard Sherman
Barnstaple attorneys: Phillip Ley, John Rosyer
(for another Barnstaple error case with Barnstaple attorneys Nicholas Stephyn and Evan Bartlett, see)
Error in king's bench (Michaelmas term, 1607) on an action in the court of Barnstaple, Devon
AALT images for Hernyman et al. v. Sherman This action of error on a case of debt on an obligation in the court of
Barnstaple includes a plea in bar that the debtor made the obligation
only from fear of serious threats by the plaintiffs. In the central
courts, that kind of bar was almost never verified by jury verdict, so
that it seems it was only a delaying tactic. It may have been in
Barnstaple also. Nevertheless, the Barnstaple court was not satisfied
the two issues initially joined and required the case to be pleaded
again. No process in king’s bench was enrolled. The lord king sent to the mayor, aldermen and recorder of the borough
or town of Barnstaple alias Barstaple his writ close in these words: James by the grace of God king of England, Scotland, France, and
Ireland, defender of the faith etc., to the mayor, aldermen, and
recorder of the borough or town of Barnstaple alias Barstable,
greetings. Because in the record and process as well as in the
rendering of judgment of a plea that was before you in the court of
the abovesaid borough or town without our writ according to the
custom of the same court between Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gernynge, and John Giste and
Leonard Sherman concerning a debt of £30 4s that the same
Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John, and John exact from the
aforementioned Leonard as it is said manifest error intervened to
the grave damage of the same Leonard as we have received from
his complaint, we, wanting the error if any there was to be
corrected in due manner and full and swift justice to be done to the
abovesaid parties in this part, order you that if judgment thereof
has been rendered, then send distinctly and openly the abovesaid
record and process together with everything touching them to us
under your seal, and this writ, so that we have them on the morrow
of All Souls wherever we shall then be in England, so that, the
abovesaid record and process having been inspected, we may make
to be done further thereof for the correction of that error what of
right and according to the law and custom of our realm of England
should be done. Tested me myself at Westminster August 21 in the
5th year of our reign of England, France and Ireland and the 41st of
Scotland [August 21, 1607].Albery We, John Pearde mayor of the borough of Barnstaple withinwritten
and James Woodroff and Paul Worth aldermen of the same
borough of the lord king, at the day contained within certify that
we send the record and process of which mention is made within
with everything touching them at the same day, which are sewn to
this writ. John Peard, James Woodroff, Paul Worth. Barnstaple. The court of the lord king at Barnstaple in the borough
of Barnstaple held by virtue of a charter of liberties granted to the
mayor, aldermen, and burgesses of the borough of Barnstaple
abovesaid by the Lady Elizabeth late queen of England in the
guildhall of the said borough of Barnstaple there before John Peard
mayor of the borough of Barnstaple abovesaid and James
Woodroff and Paul Worth aldermen of the same borough on
Monday, viz., April 6 in the 5th year of the reign of our Lord James
by the grace of God king of England, Scotland, and Ireland,
defender of the faith etc., scilt., the 5th of England, France and
Ireland and the 40th of Scotland [April 6, 1607]. At this court come Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas
Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist in their proper persons and
complain against Leonard Sherman concerning a plea of debt on a
demand of £30 4s of the lawful money of England etc. And they
find pledges to prosecute the abovesaid complaint, viz. John Doe
and Richard Roe. Thereon the same Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist seek that the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman be summoned thereof etc. Therefore
it is ordered to Robert Light and William Voysey serjeants at mace
of the mayor in the borough of Barnstaple abovesaid and ministers
of the court of the lord king there jointly and severally that they
summon by good summoners the abovesaid Leonard Sherman so
that he be here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of the
said lord king to be held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen of the said borough on Monday, scilt., April 20 next to
come [April 20, 1607] in the guildhall of the abovesaid borough to
answer the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist concerning the
abovesaid plea. The same day is given to the aforementioned
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist here etc. At which day and court held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in the abovesaid
guildhall came the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist in their
proper persons. And they presented themselves against the
aforementioned Leonard Sherman concerning the abovesaid plea.
And he did not come. And the aforementioned Robert Light and
William Voysey serjeants etc., come and now here attest that the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman has nothing etc. Therefore it is
ordered to the aforementioned Robert Light and William Voysey
serjeants etc., jointly and severally that they take the abovesaid
Leonard Sherman if he can be found within the precinct of the
abovesaid borough or the liberties of the same to be guarded safely
and securely so that they have or either of them have his body here,
scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to
be held before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said
borough on Monday, scilt., May 4 next to come [May 4, 1607] in
the guildhall of the abovesaid borough to answer the
aforementioned Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John, and John Gist here
etc. [IMG 0497] At which day and court held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in the guildhall there
come both the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Giste in their proper
persons and the abovesaid Leonard Sherman in his proper person.
And the aforementioned William Voysey serjeant etc., now sends
that he took the abovesaid Leonard Sherman whose body here at
this day and court he has ready to answer the aforementioned
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Giste concerning the abovesaid plea as it was
ordered to him. And thereon the same Leonard Sherman finds for
the aforementioned mayor and aldermen according to the custom
of the borough abovesaid sufficient mainprise, viz., William
Lanyon and Elizabeth Sherman widow burgesses of the abovesaid
borough, who mainpern for the abovesaid Leonard that the same
Leonard Sherman will stand to right in the abovesaid court on the
abovesaid complaint and will make default at no day given him
thereof nor withdraw himself nor absent himself from the
execution of judgment thereof rendered against him under the
penalty of incurring the same execution to be made from their
body, lands, and tenements if it happen that the abovesaid Leonard
Sherman at any day of the plea thereof make default or absent
himself from receiving and awaiting the execution of a judgment
against him rendered. And thereon the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist put in
their place Phillip Ley to lose or gain against the aforementioned
Leonard Sherman concerning the abovesaid plea. And the abovesaid Leonard Sherman puts in his place John
Rosyer to lose or gain against the aforementioned Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Giste concerning the abovesaid plea. And day is given to the abovesaid parties here, scilt., at
Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to be held
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said borough
on Monday, viz., May 18 next to come [May 18, 1607] in the
status as now saving to the parties etc. Barnstaple. Pleas held in the court of the lord king at Barnstaple in
the borough of Barnstaple abovesaid by virtue of the charter of
liberties granted to the mayor, aldermen, and burgesses of the
borough of Barnstaple abovesaid by the Lady Elizabeth late queen
of England in the guildhall of the said borough of Barnstaple there
before John Peard mayor of the borough of Barnstaple abovesaid
and James Woodroof and Paul Worth aldermen of the same
borough on Monday, viz., June 1 in the year of the reign of our
Lord James by the grace of God king of England, Scotland, France,
and Ireland, defender of the faith etc., scilt., the 5th of England,
France, and Ireland and the 40th of Scotland [June 1, 1607]. Barnstaple. Leonard Sherman was summoned to answer Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist concerning a plea that he render to them £30 4s of the
lawful money of England that he owes them and unjustly detains,
wherefore the same Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas
Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by Phillip Ley their attorney
say that, whereas the abovesaid Leonard Sherman [IMG 1400] on
January 8 in the year of the Lord 1606 and the 4th year of King
James of England and 40th of Scotland here at Barnstaple
abovesaid within the jurisdiction of the court [by] his signed bill of
the same Leonard acknowledged that he owed and was indebted to
the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas
Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Giste in the abovesaid £30 4s,
viz., to the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman £8 parcel of the
abovesaid £30 4s, to Brian Leathland £6 12s another parcel of the
abovesaid £30 4s, to Thomas Rowe £5 8s parcel of the abovesaid
£30 4s, to John Gerrynge £5 2s another parcel of the abovesaid £30
4s, and to the aforementioned John Gist £5 2s the residue of the
abovesaid £30 4s, that in all amounts to the abovesaid sum of £30
4s of the lawful money of England to be rendered and paid to the
aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas
Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Giste at or before the last day of
January then next following, nevertheless the abovesaid Leonard
Sherman although often asked has not at all paid according to the
tenor of the abovesaid bill the abovesaid £30 4s, viz., to the
aforementioned Thomas Hernyman the abovesaid £8, to Brian
Leathland £6 12s, to Thomas Rowe £5 8s, to John Gerrynge £5 2s,
and to the aforementioned John Gist £5 2s, that in all amounts to
the abovesaid sum of £30 4s of the lawful etc., at or before the
abovesaid last day of January, but wholly refuses and declines to
render them to them as said above and still refuses and declines,
wherefore the same Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John, and John say
that they are worse off and have damages to the value of £10, and
thereof they produce suit etc. And they proffer here in court the
abovesaid bill that attests the abovesaid debt in the abovesaid form,
the date of which is the day and year before abovesaid. And the abovesaid Leonard Sherman by the abovesaid John
Rosyer his attorney comes and defends force and injury when etc.,
and he seeks license thereof to emparl here, scilt., at Barnstaple
abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to be held before the
aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said borough on
Monday, viz., June 15 next to come in the guildhall of the
abovesaid borough. And it is granted to him etc. The same day is
given to the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist here etc. At which day and court held here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in
the guildhall abovesaid before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen came both the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by the
abovesaid Phillip Ley their attorney and the abovesaid Leonard
Sherman by John Rosyer his abovesaid attorney. And the
abovesaid Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John Gerrynge, and John Giste
offered themselves against the aforementioned Leonard Sherman
concerning the abovesaid plea. And the same Leonard Sherman says by protesting that the
narration of the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist as well as the
material contained in the same is not at all sufficient in law to put
the same Leonard Sherman to answer to the same, nevertheless for
a plea the same Leonard Sherman says that he ought not to
maintain the abovesaid plea against him in the abovesaid name of
Thomas Hernyman, because he says that there is not had any such
Thomas Hernyman in the nature of things as mentioned by the
abovesaid plea. And the abovesaid Leonard Sherman further says
that at the time of the making of the abovesaid bill the abovesaid
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist imposed by inflicting on the same
Leonard such and so great threats of his life and mutilation of his
members unless he wanted to make that bill to the aforementioned
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist at Barnstaple within the jurisdiction of
this court that the same Leonard Sherman then made that bill on
account of the fear of the threats of the aforementioned Thomas,
Brian, Thomas, John and John. And this he is ready to verify,
wherefore he seeks judgment if he ought to be burdened with the
abovesaid debt by virtue of the abovesaid bill etc. And the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist say that they by
anything alleged above ought not to be precluded from having their
abovesaid action, because they say that there is such a Thomas
Hernyman who is had, named, and known in the nature of things
by the name of Thomas Hernyman as is specified in the abovesaid
narration. And further they say that the abovesaid Leonard
Sherman at the time of the making of the abovesaid bill was sui
juris, at large and made and sealed that bill from his full and
spontaneous will to the same Thomas Henryman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist and not from fear of
threats as the abovesaid Leonard above alleged in his bar. And
they seek that this be inquired by the countryside. And the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman similarly etc. Therefore it is ordered to the aforementioned Robert Light
serjeant etc., that he make to come here, scilt., at Barnstaple
abovesaid, at the abovesaid court of the said lord king to be held
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said borough
on Monday, scilt., June 29 next to come in the guildhall [IMG
1401] of the abovesaid borough 12 prudent, free, and lawful men
of the abovesaid borough by whom the truth of the matter can
better be known and who neither to the aforementioned Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist nor to the aforementioned Leonard Sherman are related
by any affinity to recognize on their oath if there was had any such
Thomas Hernyman in the nature of things and if at the time of the
making of the abovesaid bill the aforementioned Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist imposed by threatening the aforementioned Leonard
with such and so great threats of his life and mutilation of his
members unless he wanted to make that bill to the aforementioned
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist that the same Leonard on account of the
fear of those threats made that bill to the same Thomas, Brian,
Thomas, John, and John as the abovesaid Leonard Sherman says or
not but rather that there is such a Thomas Hernyman who in the
nature of things is had and if the abovesaid Leonard Sherman at the
time of the making of the abovesaid bill was sui juris, at large, and
made that bill from his full and spontaneous will to the
aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas
Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist and not on account of the fear
of those threats as the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerringe, and John Gist say,
because both the abovesaid Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John and
John and the abovesaid Leonard Sherman put themselves on that
jury. The same day is given to the abovesaid parties here etc. At which day and court held here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the abovesaid
borough in the guildhall there came both the abovesaid Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist by the aforementioned Phillip Ley their attorney and the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman by the abovesaid John Rosyer his
attorney. And the abovesaid Robert Light serjeant etc., comes and
returns the abovesaid precept directed to him together with the
panel of the names of jurors sewn to the same precept, who
exacted, some of them came and some of them did not come.
Thereon the abovesaid plea is put in respite here, scilt., at
Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to be held
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said borough
on Monday, viz., July 13 next to come [July 13, 1607] in the
guildhall of the abovesaid borough for default of the jurors and by
the assent of the said parties. [IMG 0498] And it is ordered to the
aforementioned Robert Light serjeant etc., that he then have here
the bodies of the abovesaid jurors to recognize in the abovesaid
form. The same day is given to the parties abovesaid here etc. At which day and court held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in the guildhall there
came both the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by Phillip Ley their
attorney abovesaid and the abovesaid Leonard Sherman by John
Rosyer his abovesaid attorney. And the aforementioned Robert
Light serjeant etc., did not send his precept here etc. And thereon, the premisses having been seen and more fully
understood by the court of the said lord king here, it sufficiently
appears that that plea of the same Leonard Sherman pleaded in
preclusion of the action of the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist is less
sufficient in law and the issue subsequent thereof less aptly joined,
it is considered that the abovesaid jurors impaneled between them
go thereof without day and that the parties abovesaid re-plead, viz.,
that the abovesaid Leonard Sherman answer anew to the abovesaid
narration and that the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist re-plead
and that the abovesaid Leonard Sherman rejoin until they join a
new issue or new issues thereof or plead in judgment. And thereon the abovesaid Leonard Sherman seeks thereof a
day to emparl here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of
the said lord king to be held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen of the said borough on Monday, scilt., July 27 next to
come [July 27, 1607] in the guildhall of the abovesaid borough,
and it is granted to him by assent of the abovesaid Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist. The same day is given to the aforementioned Thomas,
Brian, Thomas, John, and John Gist here etc. At which day and court held before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in the abovesaid
guildhall came both the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by the
abovesaid Phillip Ley their attorney and the abovesaid Leonard
Sherman by the abovesaid John Rosyer his attorney. And the
abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathlande, Thomas Rowe,
John Gerrynge, and John Gist seek that the abovesaid Leonard
answer to the abovesaid narration etc. And the same Leonard says
nothing in bar of the abovesaid action of the abovesaid Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist, whereby the same Thomas, Brian, Thomas, John, and
John remain against the aforementioned Leonard Sherman thereof
undefended [sic]. And because the abovesaid mayor and aldermen
here want to advise themselves on the plea and default abovesaid
and on other the premisses before they render judgment thereof,
day is given to the parties abovesaid that they be here, scilt., at
Barnstaple abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to be held
before the mayor and aldermen of the said borough on Monday,
viz., August 10 next to come [August 10, 1607] in the guildhall of
the abovesaid borough to hear thereof their judgment etc. At which day and court before the aforementioned mayor and
aldermen here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid in the guildhall there
came the aforementioned Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by the abovesaid
Phillip Ley their attorney and the abovesaid Leonard Sherman did
not come. [IMG 0499] And the abovesaid plea and default and other the premisses
having been seen and more fully understood by the court of the
said lord king here, it is considered that the abovesaid Thomas
Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and
John Gist recover against the the abovesaid Leonard Sherman their
debt of the abovesaid £30 4s as well as 20s both for their damages
by occasion of the detention of that debt and for their outlays and
costs put out on their suit in this part adjudicated to the same
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist by their assent by the court here, and the
same Leonard Sherman in mercy etc. And thereon it is ordered to
the aforementioned Robert Light serjeant etc., that he take the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman if he can be found within the borough
of Barnstaple abovesaid, the precincts or liberties of the same to
guard him safely and securely so that he have his body at the court
of the said lord king to be held here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen of the said borough
on Monday, viz., August 24 next to come [August 24, 1607] in the
guildhall of the abovesaid borough to satisfy the aforementioned
Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John
Gerrynge, and John Gist of the debt, damages, outlays, and costs
abovesaid whereof he is convicted etc. At which day and court held here, scilt., at Barnstaple abovesaid
before the aforementioned mayor and aldermen in the abovesaid
guildhall came the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian Leathland,
Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist by the abovesaid
Phillip Ley their attorney. And they presented themselves against
the aforementioned Leonard Sherman concerning the abovesaid
plea. And he did not come. And the aforementioned Robert Light
serjeant etc., sent that the abovesaid Leonard Sherman is not found
within the borough abovesaid nor the precinct or liberties of the
same. Therefore it is ordered to the aforementioned Robert Light
serjeant etc., according to the custom of the abovesaid borough that
by good and lawful men burgesses of the abovesaid borough he
should make known to the aforementioned Elizabeth Sherman
widow and William Lanyon pledges and mainpernors of the
abovesaid Leonard Sherman that they be here, scilt., at Barnstaple
abovesaid at the court of the said lord king to be held before the
mayor and aldermen of the said borough on Monday, scilt.,
September 7 next to come in the guildhall of the abovesaid
borough to show why the abovesaid Thomas Hernyman, Brian
Leathland, Thomas Rowe, John Gerrynge, and John Gist ought not
have their execution against them of the debt, damages, outlays and
costs abovesaid according to the force, form, and effect of the
abovesaid mainprise if it seem to them expedient and further to do
and receive what the court of the said lord king then there should
consider in this part etc. [Nothing more is enrolled.]
0496,
0497,
1400,
1402,
0498,
0499